|
Core Beliefs of Swedenborg
Categories:
Main Beliefs | Life | Afterlife |
Prayer
Main
Beliefs
God The Creator
The Lord The Redeemer
The Holy Spirit
The Divine Trinity
The Sacred Scripture
The Ten Commandments
Faith and Charity
Freedom of Choice
Repentance
Reformation and Regeneration
Baptism and the Holy Supper
LIFE
Reflections on Divine Providence
Dreams Helen Kennedy
Footprints in the Writings of
Swedenborg
Hearing Someone Else's
Prayer
Meetings in Life
Prayer for Others
Reflections on
Spirituality
Toward a Spiritual
Psychology
We Don't Really Live Here
Why Was Jesus Crucified?
End of the Age
AFTERLIFE
Who
is the God of Heaven
Angels in the New
Testament
Children in Heaven
Life After Death
Some Thoughts about
Hell
Spiritual Substance and Material Reality
Swedenborg in
Popular Angels Books
What Angels Do
PRAYER
When we Pray, What Shall we Ask?
Prayer for Others
Hearing Someone Else's
Prayer
|
Jeremy Rose
"I'm
not a very spiritual person," someone said to me in a conversation
recently. It seemed like a legitimate thing to say, and I didn't argue
at the time. People often place themselves somewhere on a spiritual
continuum, and we often think of ourselves as being "more spiritual" or
"less spiritual" than someone else.
But the more I thought about the phrase "I'm not a very spiritual
person," the more it bothered me. I don't usually tell people flat out
that they are wrong during a discussion, but if this person were to make
that statement again, I think I would this time. Because the plain truth
is, we are 100% spiritual people. That's who we are - we are spirits
placed temporarily on earth. A human being saying they are not spiritual
is a little like a fish saying they are not very "aquatic" - picture a
fish saying: "I don't go in the water much; I don't like it; it's just
not me."
Some of this peculiarity comes from our definitions of the word
"spiritual" - certainly a word that means very different things to
different people. To some, it means they like burning incense and
chanting. To others, it may mean they always say the blessing before
every meal and can quote you chapter and verse of the Bible. To still
others, it just means there are a certain set of emotional states that
they enjoy being in.
If you think of "spiritual" in these terms, it makes sense to say that
you are "not very spiritual." But if you think in terms of "spirit"
being what your essence is, it doesn't make any sense to say that
someone can be more or less spiritual, or to say that someone is not
very spiritual because of things they do or don't do.
The flip side of it would be to say, "I'm not a very physical person."
That can mean things that you habitually do (i.e. exercise) or enjoy
(i.e. sensory pleasures) are not really you. In a sense, you can be "not
very physical," but in another sense, it's just not a legitimate thing
to say.
To return to the fish analogy, human beings are curious creatures
because we are really amphibious. Amphibious is not even an accurate
term, because it means able to live in both worlds (water and land), and
able to go back and forth between these environments without difficulty.
Human beings are a little different; we are both physical and spiritual
at the same time, and there's no physical analogy for it: you can't be
simultaneously underwater and on dry land. But that's not the most
peculiar thing about our state of being - the most peculiar thing is
that we are not necessarily aware of what kind of creatures we are. We
can say, and honestly believe, that we are "not spiritual" because human
beings are capable of being oblivious to what we really are, and the
nature of the world we really live in.
One of the things about Swedenborg that is most challenging for some
people to believe is his claim that he lived in both the spiritual and
the natural worlds simultaneously, and did it for years. This is such a
radical concept that it causes some to dismiss Swedenborg as a madman.
The funny thing is, we all do that, every day of our natural lives. The
biggest difference is that Swedenborg was fully conscious of the
spiritual world, or in his words, his "spiritual eyes were opened." We,
on the other hand, live in the spiritual world with our eyes closed for
the time being.
People who study different cultures have a saying: "We don't know who
discovered water, but we're pretty sure it wasn't the fish." In a sense,
fish can't tell you very much about water, because they have nothing to
compare it to - if fish had language, for instance, they wouldn't have a
word for "wet" because they wouldn't have a word for "dry." So it's
actually not so peculiar as it first sounds for beings to not be aware
of the nature of their being. Then again, amphibious creatures like
frogs would have words for "wet" and "dry," because going back and forth
between those two states is a big part of their life.
But here we are, living in two worlds at once, and capable of being
completely fooled into thinking we only live in one. The physical world
is so obvious, so tangible, so distracting, so "real" that it's
sometimes hard to believe that there is a world even more "real" than
this.
Sure, we can occasionally spend a little time in church thinking about
some ethereal concepts and pray to an invisible God, but when we're
done, we go outside into the "real" world of trees and sky and rocks and
traffic and smog. Nobody argues that rocks don't exist the way the
existence of God is debated. And there's nothing like hunger pangs or a
bad back or a loud noise to make it impossible for us to think about
anything spiritual. The spiritual world can't compete - the physical
world is just plain, obviously, visibly, provably more real.
We are physical beings, consisting of a few dollars worth of chemicals
plus a lot of water. All those emotions we get hung up on are just
chemical reactions; thoughts are nothing more than electrical impulses.
People who see visions of spiritual realms are just suffering from
neurological abnormalities. Science seems more and more eager all the
time to tell us that every aspect of our being is genetically
determined. Newsweek, for instance, recently declared that nothing we do
as parents really matters in how our children turn out, it's just DNA.
Feel sad in the wintertime? Probably just Seasonal Affect Disorder,
brought about by deficiencies in ultraviolet rays. Falling in love with
someone? Probably just pheromones.
Of course, it's understandable that science denies one side of our
amphibious nature, because science is only capable of looking at the
other side. If you're like me, you rebel against the thought that
everything is genetically determined before birth because you know, from
your own spiritual life, that it's not true. We know, for instance, that
we are still "close" to someone even though they are 3,000 miles away,
and we know that, despite the accuracy of atomic clocks, time does not
progress at a constant rate. We know, perhaps not on a conscious level,
that we are spiritual beings, and no amount of scientific study will
ever pin that down.
When we start to look at what our lives actually revolve around, it is
clear that our lives have very little to do with physical reality. Sure,
rocks and trees and food and the weather may be undeniably real, but for
most of us they are not the core of our lives. Our lives center on
things "unreal."
For instance, when I teach, I can't help noticing how grade-obsessed
students can be. Their whole lives can be turned upside down by a grade.
But what, exactly, is a grade? Certainly, it is not something with any
physical reality to it. I mean, dogs know physical reality when they see
it, but you could never explain to a dog what a "grade" is. Once they
get out of school, many people live their lives around money - but
again, what is money? Well, it's smudgy paper with weird symbols on it.
Actually, most of the time it's not even that; it's numbers on a
computer printout. If you play the stock market, what "really" happens?
Nothing at all. Numbers go up, numbers go down. "Money is power," they
say, but "power" isn't usually something physically real either. Then
there's "honour," a very meaningful concept to a lot of people, even
though it's really something that exists only in people's minds.
In my job, working on legal cases, I can't help noticing that justice is
something that most people care very deeply about, even though that too
has very little to do with physical reality. In Minnesota, we just
finished a statewide tobacco trial, and the tobacco companies lost a
great deal of honor, power, and money. Try explaining any of that to a
dog.
The most meaningful thing in most people's lives is relationships, of
course. Apart from physical displays of affection, a relationship is a
purely spiritual thing. There are good ones and bad ones, deep ones and
shallow ones, loving ones and loveless ones, functional ones and
dysfunctional ones, but all relationships are spiritual. They are based
around thoughts and feelings and commitments and understandings, and
this is what the spiritual world consists of. These are the things that
are, to us, more real than "reality." These are the things that tell us,
if we're paying attention, that we are 100% spiritual beings. The
physical world may be awfully nice, but we don't really live here. And
we could all stand to pay a little more attention to the world we really
do live in.
[Top]
|